Updated: Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Sell by Sep. 1st: Preseason Blogpoll

We are nigh on to 11 days remaining in this fleeting preseason. Time to put in our first official ballot for the Blogpoll, even if I'm not official, and even if it's not officially started. Considering you need to be in the preseason to make a preseason poll, now is as good a time as ever. I've been able to distract the kid with various football distractions and Guitar Hero 80's, so let's get this over with.

  1. Southern Cal
  2. LSU
  3. Texas
  4. West Virginia
  5. Michigan
  6. Oklahoma
  7. Louisville
  8. Virginia Tech
  9. Florida State
  10. Ohio State
  11. UCLA
  12. Oregon
  13. Florida
  14. Penn State
  15. Wisconsin
  16. South Carolina
  17. California
  18. Nebraska
  19. Alabama
  20. Missouri
  21. Texas A&M
  22. Georgia Tech
  23. Iowa
  24. South Florida
  25. Hawaii
Comments, Observations, various unfounded preseason Speculation:

1-5: USC, LSU, Texas, WfnVU, Michigan-

You're odds on favorites to win the coveted BCS auto-bids, and heir apparents for the national title game. Southern Cal and LSU are my defacto 1-2 based on combination of talent and schedules. Texas comes in at 3 because I have them as a slight favorite to win the Red River Big XII Title game. WVU get Louisville at home and are otherwise freaking ridiculous. Michigan is here with ND, THE Ohio, and Penn State at home, and are current kings of the Big Ten hill until someone knocks them off.

6-10: Oklahoma, Louisville, Virginia Tech, Florida State, Ohio State-
This is a tricky area, especially considering the entire muddle that is ranks 4-10 this preseason. There's a lot more question marks than anyone would like to admit, and no one has the Trevosity of one such as myself. It boils down to this for my preseason prognostickery: Who would you rather be in NCAA 2008? Texas over OU, UM over OSU, WfnVU>>>>>>Louisville. Technically, if I held 2008 standard to my entire top 25, WVU would be 1-3, followed by USC, and Hawaii, Penn State, and Notre Dame would be ranked irrationally high. VT/FSU belong up here as the predicted class of the ACC with some favorable scheduling to boot. Ohio State rounds out the rest as they only play 3 games, and get 8 preseason tuneups to work out the kinks.

11-15: UCLA, Oregon, Florida, Penn State, Wisconsin-
The required "2-3 losses, but maybe less with some help" section. Previously dominated by soon-to-be meat-grinded SEC bellweathers, this year's poll is foolish enough to believe that any of these teams has the opportunity to pull a fast one on Southern Cal or Michigan, or, in Florida's case, get out of their SEC schedule alive. Penn State has the slight schedule edge on Wisconsin, and we're already penciling in UCLA and Oregon for prime spots in a PAC-10 Wheel of Death.

16-20: South Carolina, California, Nebraska, Alabama, Missouri-
Someone has to win the Big XII North, and I'm already getting ready to watch my 'Huskers lose to their title game by 40 points. It's actually an honor to be sacrificed for Dr. Pepper. South Carolina and Alabama get in as teams that can make me look smart despite losing their divisions. Missouri begrudgingly rounds out the end, just in case they live up to the hype.

21-25: Texas A&M, Georgia Tech, Iowa, USF, Hawaii-
Darkhorse. Darkhorse. Darkhorse. Darkhorse. Colt Brennan. He plays in the WAC. A great WAC team is always 25th, crossing their fingers for some kind computer help, not unlike the movie SpaceCamp. The Aggies and Yellow Jackets have their work cut out for them, and I'd take A&M in a fight. Iowa gets the obligatory Big Ten BYE schedule...maybe they won't screw it up. USF is almost cliche, but I'm riding it to hell.

Also receiving an undisclosed amount of unordered votes:
Auburn, Tennessee, Notre Dame, Rutgers, Georgia, Arizona State, and Duke (1)-

Anyone of these teams, except for Duke, could be in the 15-25 range by mid-September. All it takes is a few stumbles or, in the Volunteers' case, dousing Cal in moonshine and lighting them on fire. Arizona State, again they tempt me, convincing everyone else that they should be someone to watch, now with 100% more crazy Erickson, so I'll throw them into the the honorable mention category. Rutgers may just outlast their sophomore slump, and a low top 25 season would be certainly commendable. The Irish are an enigma wrapped in a riddle, so to keep the kid drawing spirals on the office fixtures and muttering about secret robot transmissions, I'm throwing them firmly in the "possible potential" category.

Trev Alberts is a licensed CSTV football talking guy. Excuse him while he drops a truth bomb.

Labels: , , ,



Anonymous captaineclectic said...

Not ranking ND #25 is for sissies.

3:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So South Carolina is better than Georgia, Arkansas, and Auburn? You've lost it. Wait, you never had it.

9:19 AM  
Blogger Willy Mac said...

Don't agree with South Carolina. Name me more than two outstanding players on their team. Spurrier doesn't count. Also GT is way overrated. I do like TAMU to do big things this year.

1:12 PM  
Blogger IamCris said...

totally unrelated but two things, first....is Mark May his face, is it getting large of is my HD screen messed up? Second, not alot of people leave comments here, i'm not dissing but is there a large following on your blog? Always been a fan of the game, at any rate, seems as though you've do a really good job here. So yeah college football season and Go Blue

9:29 PM  
Blogger IrishOutsider said...

Mr. Alberts doesn't play nice with comments, but don't let that discourage anyone from trying to start up some good banter. I'd do it myself, but it already falls on enough dead ears at the office.

Catching up:
- Don't you put that black magic on us, captaineclectic.

- Trev has never admitted possession of "it."

- GT and SOS are playable on 2008. TAMU if you don't like passing.

- Mark May's goatee creates a distorting effect on most HD screens. Do not look directly at it.

7:39 AM  
Anonymous captaineclectic said...

Black magic?

Outsider, I think you've made a serious error. My ways are sorcerous, true, but I confine my magic to this variety:


7:07 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home